Moonshot AI Tapped Nvidia GB300 Chips via Thailand, White House Says
A White House official says Chinese AI firm Moonshot AI accessed restricted Nvidia chips through Thailand, raising export control concerns.
A White House official has alleged that Moonshot AI, the Chinese artificial intelligence company behind last week's high-profile Kimi K3 model release, obtained access to Nvidia's GB300 chips through Thailand — a country not subject to the same sweeping semiconductor export restrictions that Washington has imposed on China. The disclosure signals that U.S. export controls may be facing a significant enforcement challenge as Chinese AI firms find indirect pathways to cutting-edge American hardware.
The GB300 is among Nvidia's most advanced data center chips, part of the Blackwell architecture generation designed for large-scale AI workloads. U.S. export rules prohibit the direct sale of such high-performance chips to Chinese entities, a policy intended to slow the development of advanced AI and military-adjacent computing capabilities in China. If the allegation is accurate, Moonshot AI's ability to leverage GB300 hardware would suggest those controls are being circumvented through third-party jurisdictions — a routing strategy that trade compliance experts have long warned about.
Read more Moonshot AI Used Nvidia GB300 Chips in Thailand Despite US Export Ban →
Moonshot AI garnered international attention last week when it launched Kimi K3, a model that drew comparisons to frontier systems developed in the United States. The timing of the White House official's statement — arriving so closely after that release — suggests U.S. officials are actively monitoring the hardware supply chains underpinning Chinese AI development, not merely the model outputs. The case could intensify pressure on the Biden-era and Trump-era export control frameworks to close geographic loopholes.
The Thailand angle also reflects a broader pattern in which Southeast Asian nations have emerged as potential transshipment hubs for controlled technologies, whether intentionally or as a byproduct of regional data center investment booms. Policymakers may now face difficult questions about how to tighten controls without straining relationships with partner nations in a strategically important region. How the U.S. government chooses to respond — whether through diplomatic pressure, new licensing requirements, or penalties — could set a precedent for how export enforcement evolves in the AI era.
Continue reading at CNBC.
