Guggenheim Says ServiceNow and Salesforce Are Buys Amid AI Fear Selloff
A Guggenheim analyst argues that 'Armageddon' fears over AI disruption have pushed both software stocks to unjustifiably low valuations.
Wall Street's anxiety about artificial intelligence displacing enterprise software incumbents has grown intense enough that at least one prominent analyst believes the market has overcorrected. Guggenheim's coverage team is now flagging ServiceNow and Salesforce as buying opportunities, contending that the valuation compression in both names reflects a worst-case scenario that is unlikely to fully materialize.
The core argument is one of proportionality: yes, the AI threat to traditional software-as-a-service business models is genuine, and neither company is immune to disruption pressure. But pricing those stocks as though catastrophic revenue erosion is a near certainty — what the analyst characterizes as "Armageddon" thinking — appears to overshoot the realistic risk. Both ServiceNow and Salesforce have scale, deep enterprise relationships, and platform ecosystems that give them meaningful tools to adapt and even integrate AI capabilities rather than simply be supplanted by them.
Read more Tradeweb Settles First Real-Time Tokenized Treasury on Canton Network →
This kind of contrarian call during a sentiment trough is a classic analytical posture: when fear drives valuations below what fundamentals justify, the risk-reward ratio shifts in favor of patient buyers. The Guggenheim view implicitly suggests that the market is conflating disruption risk with existential risk — a distinction that matters enormously for investors weighing entry points in large-cap software.
The broader context here is that legacy SaaS platforms have been under sustained scrutiny as AI-native startups promise to automate workflows that previously required expensive software subscriptions. That narrative has weighed heavily on the sector, but legacy vendors with large installed bases and sticky enterprise contracts rarely collapse on the timeline that disruption narratives imply. The Guggenheim call reflects a bet that incumbency still carries durable value, even in a rapidly evolving AI landscape.
Continue reading at MarketWatch.com